Skip to main content

A BRIEF HISTORY OF FLUID MECHANICS


 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FLUID MECHANICS
Photos: The Wright brothers take flight | CNN Travel


1 One of the first engineering problems humankind faced as cities were developed was the supply of water for domestic use and irrigation of crops. Our urban lifestyles can be retained only with abundant water, and it is clear from archeology that every successful civilization of prehistory invested in the construction and maintenance of water systems. The Roman aqueducts, some of which are still in use, are the best known examples. However, perhaps the most impressive engineering from a technical viewpoint was done at the Hellenistic city of Pergamon in present-day Turkey. There, from 283 to 133 bc, they built a series of pressurized lead and clay pipelines (Fig. 1–9), up to 45 km long that operated at pressures exceeding 1.7 MPa (180 m of head). Unfortunately, the names of almost all these early builders are lost to history. The earliest recognized contribution to fluid mechanics theory was made by the Greek mathematician Archimedes (285–212 bc). He formulated and applied the buoyancy principle in history’s first nondestructive test to determine the gold content of the crown of King Hiero I. The Romans built great aqueducts and educated many conquered people on the benefits of clean water, but overall had a poor understanding of fluids theory. (Perhaps they shouldn’t have killed Archimedes when they sacked Syracuse.) During the Middle Ages, the application of fluid machinery slowly but steadily expanded. Elegant piston pumps were developed for dewatering mines, and the watermill and windmill were perfected to grind grain, forge metal, and for other tasks. For the first time in recorded human history, significant work was being done without the power of a muscle supplied by a person or animal, and these inventions are generally credited with enabling the later industrial revolution. Again the creators of most of the progress are unknown, but the devices themselves were well documented by several technical writers such as Georgius Agricola (Fig. 1–10). The Renaissance brought continued development of fluid systems and machines, but more importantly, the scientific method was perfected and adopted throughout Europe. Simon Stevin (1548–1617), Galileo Galilei (1564–1642), Edme Mariotte (1620–1684), and Evangelista Torricelli (1608–1647) were among the first to apply the method to fluids as they investigated hydrostatic pressure distributions and vacuums. That work was integrated and refined by the brilliant mathematician and philosopher, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). The Italian monk, Benedetto Castelli (1577–1644) was the first person to publish a statement of the continuity principle for fluids. Besides formulating his equations of motion for solids, Sir Isaac Newton (1643–1727) applied his laws to fluids and explored fluid inertia and resistance, free jets, and viscosity. That effort was built upon by Daniel Bernoulli (1700–1782), a Swiss, and his associate Leonard Euler (1707– 1783). Together, their work defined the energy and momentum equations. Bernoulli’s 1738 classic treatise Hydrodynamica may be considered the first fluid mechanics text. Finally, Jean d’Alembert (1717–1789) developed the idea of velocity and acceleration components, a differential expression of continuity, and his “paradox” of zero resistance to steady uniform motion over a body. The development of fluid mechanics theory through the end of the eighteenth century had little impact on engineering since fluid properties and parameters were poorly quantified, and most theories were abstractions that could not be quantified for design purposes. That was to change with the development of the French school of engineering led by Riche de Prony (1755–1839). Prony (still known for his brake to measure shaft power) and his associates in Paris at the École Polytechnique and the École des Ponts et Chaussées were the first to integrate calculus and scientific theory into the engineering curriculum, which became the model for the rest of the world. (So now you know whom to blame for your painful freshman year.) Antonie Chezy (1718–1798), Louis Navier (1785–1836), Gaspard Coriolis (1792–1843), Henry Darcy (1803–1858), and many other contributors to fluid engineering and theory were students and/or instructors at the schools. By the mid nineteenth century, fundamental advances were coming on several fronts. The physician Jean Poiseuille (1799–1869) had accurately measured flow in capillary tubes for multiple fluids, while in Germany Gotthilf Hagen (1797–1884) had differentiated between laminar and turbulent flow in pipes. In England, Lord Osborne Reynolds (1842–1912) continued that work (Fig. 1–11) and developed the dimensionless number that bears his name. Similarly, in parallel to the early work of Navier, George Stokes (1819–1903) completed the general equation of fluid motion (with friction) that takes their names. William Froude (1810–1879) almost singlehandedly developed the procedures and proved the value of physical model testing. American expertise had become equal to the Europeans as demonstrated by James Francis’ (1815–1892) and Lester Pelton’s (1829–1908) pioneering work in turbines and Clemens Herschel’s (1842–1930) invention of the Venturi meter. In addition to Reynolds and Stokes, many notable contributions were made to fluid theory in the late nineteenth century by Irish and English scientists, including William Thomson, Lord Kelvin (1824–1907), William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh (1842–1919), and Sir Horace Lamb (1849–1934). These individuals investigated a large number of problems, including dimensional analysis, irrotational flow, vortex motion, cavitation, and waves. In a broader sens their work also explored the links between fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer. The dawn of the twentieth century brought two monumental developments. First, in 1903, the self-taught Wright brothers (Wilbur, 1867–1912; Orville, 1871–1948) invented the airplane through application of theory and determined experimentation. Their primitive invention was complete and contained all the major aspects of modern aircraft (Fig. 1–12). The Navier–Stokes equations were of little use up to this time because they were too difficult to solve. In a pioneering paper in 1904, the German Ludwig Prandtl (1875–1953) showed that fluid flows can be divided into a layer near the walls, the boundary layer, where the friction effects are significant, and an outer layer where such effects are negligible and the simplified Euler and Bernoulli equations are applicable. His students, Theodor von Kármán (1881–1963), Paul Blasius (1883–1970), Johann Nikuradse (1894–1979), and others, built on that theory in both hydraulic and aerodynamic applications. (During World War II, both sides benefited from the theory as Prandtl remained in Germany while his best student, the Hungarian-born von Kármán, worked in America.) The mid twentieth century could be considered a golden age of fluid mechanics applications. Existing theories were adequate for the tasks at hand, and fluid properties and parameters were well defined. These supported a huge expansion of the aeronautical, chemical, industrial, and water resources sectors; each of which pushed fluid mechanics in new directions. Fluid mechanics research and work in the late twentieth century were dominated by the development of the digital computer in America. The ability to solve large complex problems, such as global climate modeling or the optimization of a turbine blade, has provided a benefit to our society that the eighteenth-century developers of fluid mechanics could never have imagined (Fig. 1–13). The principles presented in the following pages have been applied to flows ranging from a moment at the microscopic scale to 50 years of simulation for an entire river basin. It is truly mind-boggling. Where will fluid mechanics go in the twenty-first century and beyond? Frankly, even a limited extrapolation beyond the present would be sheer folly. However, if history tells us anything, it is that engineers will be applying what they know to benefit society, researching what they don’t know, and having a great time in the process.
Advantages of domestic wind turbines build domestic wind turbine ...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluid Kinematics

  Fluid Kinematics Fluid Kinematics  deals with the motion of fluids such as displacement, velocity, acceleration, and other aspects. This topic is useful in terms of the exam and the knowledge of the candidate. Kinematics is the branch of classical mechanics that describes the motion of bodies and systems without consideration of the forces the cause the motion. Types of Fluid Flows Fluid flow may be classified under the following headings; Steady & Unsteady Flow Uniform & Non-uniform Flow Steady uniform flow Conditions do not change with position in the stream or with time. E.g. flow of water in a pipe of constant diameter at a constant velocity. Steady non-uniform flow Conditions change from point to point in the stream but do not change with time. E.g. Flow in a tapering pipe with the constant velocity at the inlet. Unsteady uniform flow At a given instant in time the conditions at every point are the same but will change with time. E.g. A pipe of constant diameter connecte

THE NO-SLIP CONDITION

 THE NO-SLIP CONDITION Fluid flow is often confined by solid surfaces, and it is important to understand how the presence of solid surfaces affects fluid flow. We know that water in a river cannot flow through large rocks, and must go around them. That is, the water velocity normal to the rock surface must be zero, and water approaching the surface normally comes to a complete stop at the surface. What is not as obvious is that water approaching the rock at any angle also comes to a complete stop at the rock surface, and thus the tangential velocity of water at the surface is also zero. Consider the flow of a fluid in a stationary pipe or over a solid surface that is nonporous (i.e., impermeable to the fluid). All experimental observations indicate that a fluid in motion comes to a complete stop at the surfaceand assumes a zero velocity relative to the surface. That is, a fluid in direct contact with a solid “sticks” to the surface, and there is no slip. This is known as the no-slip

Internal versus External Flow

Internal versus External Flow A fluid flow is classified as being internal or external, depending on whether the fluid flows in a confined space or over a surface. The flow of an unbounded fluid over a surface such as a plate, a wire, or a pipe is external flow. The flow in a pipe or duct is internal flow if the fluid is completely bounded by solid surfaces. Water flow in a pipe, for example, is internal flow, and airflow over a ball or over an exposed pipe during a windy day is external flow (Fig. 1–18). The flow of liquids in a duct is called open-channel flow if the duct is only partially filled with the liquid and there is a free surface. The flows of water in rivers and irrigation ditches are examples of such flows. Internal flows are dominated by the influence of viscosity throughout the flow field. In external flows the viscous effects are limited to boundary layers near solid surfaces and to wake regions downstream of bodies.